Thoughts on Teacher Appreciation
Posted on May 7, 2011
Filed Under Professional Reflection, Uncategorized | Comments Off
When a musician finishes a great performance, the audience applauses. When an outfielder makes a great catch, the audience cheers. What happens when a teacher finishes a great lecture, or introduces a well designed assignment? Usually not applause or cheering.
I would venture to say that the majority of teachers feel unappreciated, or at least under appreciated at their school sites and with their students and parents.
In a conversation with a frustrated teacher the other day the comment was made, “the parents don’t know half of what I’ve done for their kids.” This got me to thinking, why don’t more parents know the extent to which we go for their kids?
The answer is, because we don’t tell them.
How can a parent be appreciative of something that they don’t know is happening?
So then, the question for myself and others is, what steps can we take to ensure that parents know what it is that we are doing for their kids? Certainly if nothing else, this discussion reinforces the importance of clear communication between the classroom and the home.
In making my own classroom communication plans I’m thinking of things like class website, monthly calendar or newsletter, weekly or daily summary/ review podcasts.
What forms of communication are others using to ensure that parents know what’s happening in the classroom? Any teachers have parents follow them on Twitter or Facebook?
As a parent myself it is very easy to be thankful and appreciative of the work that I know my son’s teacher does for him, but impossible to be appreciative for things she does that I never hear about. Not feeling appreciated yourself for the work that you do? First make sure that others actually know what it is that you’re doing.
Video vs. Still Slides
Posted on March 24, 2011
Filed Under Uncategorized | Comments Off
Hi All, 
I’m looking for some honest feedback on this.
Bill and I attended a session at CUE that suggested that online instruction might be more efficient and less distracting using still graphics rather than screencast video.
So I’m trying to put the idea to the test. Here I have two links for a 1:25 video on using the dropbox public folder. The first is a straightforward screencast and the second uses just still frames with transitions and a little graphics.
Video with Still Slides and Graphics
Question is..
1. is one more effective or more efficient than another?
2. if so which and why?
3. if you thought the still w/ graphics video was better, was it enough better to be worth an extra 30 min of post production. As compared to just record and post.
Thanks for your help on my never ending quest to learn to teach!
Tim
Routines
Posted on January 22, 2011
Filed Under Uncategorized | Comments Off
I’m currently living in a small town in Ukraine called Zhovti Vody as part of a long process to adopt my son. My wife and I have been living in a single hotel room for about a month and a half now and have about another month to go before we are able to return home as a family.
This post is not necessarily about my experience here, but about an observation that was made clearer to me in my current circumstances. In a place where I have little to do but wait and think, where factual information is a foreign notion, and where anything you’re told (even by the head judge of the court) can change at a moment’s notice I find myself taking comfort is small daily routines like making coffee, making the bed, even showing and shaving. When the big things in life are full of uncertainty it is refreshing that in some things, regardless of size and importance, you can have confidence and be certain of.
It then occurred to me that the same is true of students as well, especially those in the younger grades, but probably to a lesser degree to adults as well. When the content, tools, and concepts that are being taught and discussed in class are new and uncertain, students also can take comfort in procedures and routines that they can count on, even when necessary in the area of discipline. If I’m finding significance in the small daily routines of my strange existence here in Zhovti Vody, how much greater a value will regular classroom routines have for a middle school students making the transition from childhood to young adults.
Of course this idea is not news to anyone reading this, but it’s amazing to me even now in my tenth year of teaching how often I realize things that I’d already known to be true. So I thought I’d share.
I wonder:
What routines and procedures would bring stability to my students in a middle school computers class?
What routines and procedures would benefit adult learners just learning to integrate technology into their classrooms?
Quantity vs. Quality – really?
Posted on November 11, 2010
Filed Under Uncategorized | Comments Off
I see that I haven’t written in a while, but I am inspired to write today after learning about National Novel Writing Month or NANOWRIMO (pronounced nano-rhyme-o) during which participants are challenged to write a 50,000 word novel during the month of November. The interesting part is that the primary challenge is not the quality of the work being completed, but simply to meet the word count goal. Participants even post their word counts daily to track and compare their progress.
Quality vs. Quantity is one of the debates that continues to haunt the education community. Most educators I talk to tend to come down on the side of quality, stating that if the quality is poor then it doesn’t matter how much work is done. Which seems very true. But lately I’ve begun to disagree with the idea that we need to settle for one or the other.
This story from the book Art & Fear: Observations on the Perils (and Rewards) of Artmaking by David Bayles, and Ted Orland illustrates the idea that I am currently in agreement with:
“The ceramics teacher announced on opening day that he was dividing the class into two groups. All those on the left side of the studio, he said, would be graded solely on the quantity of work they produced, all those on the right solely on its quality. His procedure was simple: on the final day of class he would bring in his bathroom scales and weigh the work of the “quantity” group: fifty pound of pots rated an “A”, forty pounds a “B”, and so on. Those being graded on “quality”, however, needed to produce only one pot -albeit a perfect one – to get an “A”. Well, came grading time and a curious fact emerged: the works of highest quality were all produced by the group being graded for quantity. It seems that while the “quantity” group was busily churning out piles of work – and learning from their mistakes – the “quality” group had sat theorizing about perfection, and in the end had little more to show for their efforts than grandiose theories and a pile of dead clay.”
More and more I am agreeing with the correlation of quantity and quality. Howard Garner’s book on creativity illustrates that historically individual’s creative breakthroughs come on roughly a ten year cycle. Malcom Gladwell talks about 10,000 hours of practice required for the mastery of any skill. We all know that we learn from our mistakes, so maybe as educators we need to focus more on providing an environment for students to practice and make mistakes, and therefore learn from them in the process.
Even if you do believe in SturgeonsLaw which states that “90% of everything is junk,” it doesn’t take much more than basic math skills to realize that the more work you do, writing, pottery, or other, the bigger your valuable output will become. So while I have always been an advocate of outlining, brainstorming, and planning, it’s good to remember that at the end of the day the goal is to get something done, or as Andy Ihnatko says, the exercise of “generally trying to move the cursor to the right.”
References:
http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/187633.Art_Fear
Http://www.cwob.com
http://www.nanowhimo.org
Virtually Face to Face
Posted on April 12, 2010
Filed Under Ed Tech, Professional Reflection, Tools and Tips | Comments Off
Teaching online in real time

Background
While I was working on my MA I had the oportunity to take a couple of completely online courses. One being an incredible experience and the others being extremely poor. This got me to thinking about the difference between the two classes and what elements made one more effective and the others so poor. The conclusion that I came to was that for me the difference came from the amount of interaction that I experienced between the student and the professor. As I continued to learn more about current web technologies I realized that we would soon be approaching the time that online education did not have to be like the old correspondence course or even like the current asynchronous online classes. This has lead me on the path of developing my “virtually face to face” classes, working to provide the optimum learning experience by combining the best features of face to face and asynchronous online classes in an online environment. Below I will describe some of the systems and that I have used in my efforts to achieve what should be the optimal online learning environment.
- Google Sites -FREE – The first step to teaching online is having a website to serve as a virtual homebase. While you may travel all over the web exploring information and tools throughout your class you will aways want a virtual homebase where students will meet to find introductory infomration and links for the lesson as well as a location where you can post videos and review materials. Any kind of website will do, but the Google Sites are vrey simple to setup, yet very flecxible for embedding many different types of media and information. This is a great option for the novice web designer to be able to make a custom site including a blog with RSS without any programming background
- Skype – FREE – This is telephony software that allows you to make voice and video calls to other computers or telephones (voice only). You can also set up conference calls, again with voice only. While many of the meeting software packages (see below) will also handle audio, Skype has a much better audio quality and does a good job eliminating echo and feedback from users that don’t use headsets.
- Elluminate / Adobe Connect Pro / Fuze Meeting (choose one, or many other online meeting options) -
- iShowU – $20/$29/$59 – It has been my experience that one of the most valuable things that I do with my online students is to record each session for later review. This lowers the anxiety level and reduces pressure to take thourough notes, allowing students to relax and participate in the online experience. iShowU is a very simple screen capture tool that will allow you to make a video recording of your session that you can post on your website later for review. iShowU will even be able to record audio from your microphone and your computer together allowing you to preserve any audio/ video media that you played in class as well as the full skype discussion.
Simple (yet costly) Setup:
This simple setup relies mainly on a virtual classroom or meeting software with a few other tools added in for enhanced functionality. This setup could be done with just the virtual classroom software alone, but with a lower quality level. This setup is generally more expensive because of the lisencing costs for the meeting software, but is better suited for beginning online teachers and larger class sizes.
Various Monthy Subscription Costs ($30 – $50 monthly)- This kind of meeting software is great for virtual classrooms, especially if you have a large number of students. The software will allow voice and video conferencing, screen and application sharing, text chat, and a shared collaborative space. Most meeting software will also allow you to record (video and/ or audio) your sessions for students to access later for review.
- Skype – FREE – Same as in the simple setup
- CamTwist or ManyCam – FREE – This software acts as a software switcher for your video inputs as well as adding content and effects into your webcam’s video stream. Basically the program interrupts the video as it’s traveling from the web cam to the streaming or recording software, allowing you to add graphics, presentations, effects, and videos into your webcam stream.
- Audio HiJack Pro – $32 – This software is similar to Camtwist except that is serves as a software mixer for audio. It will allow you to “HiJack” audio from any audio source or application on your computer, mix and add effects, record, and route out to various audio outputs and programs. I use this program to capture the audio from my microphone and mix it with the audio from Skype, Firefox, and camtwist. I then send out the mixed audio to Quicktime and ustream using an included software audio device called Soundflower.
- Quicktime – FREE in SnowLeopard / $29 for OS X 10.5 and before- Qucktime is apple’s video and audio system. I use Quicktime to record the video output from Camtwist as well as the mixed audio output from Audio HiJack to serve as a high quality archive and review video. You don’t need to use Quicktime. Any software that will record video will serve this purpose.
- uStream.tv account – FREE – ustream.tv lets anyone have their own internet TV station. It allows you to send out a live video stream that anyone can log onto and watch. I use this system in combination with the video output from Camtwist and the mixed audio from Audio HiJack to stream my class live. Students participating in my online are able to watch the video stream to see my desktop when I am demonstratin g software, presentation slides, and videos that I want to show. If you don’t have any software to record video (or just don’t want to use it) you can also to ustream to record you sessions and embed them into your class website for student review and archive.
More Complex (and fun) Setup:
The complex setup is for the more advanced computer user as it requires more peicing together of various tools. However, many of the tools that are used in this setup are free and you won’t need to purchase the expensive meeting software packages. While more complex, and a bit more work to run, this is my prefered setup as it allows me to function in my regular desktop environment as I would as if my computer was hooked to a projector in class, rather than having to learn to function in the virtual classroom environment provided by many of the software packages. I suppose that this preference would change depending on one’s comfort level and time spent with the various software packages.
Conclusions
Regardless of what software and type of setup you choose to employ, it seems to me that the ultimate goal of all this is to recreate in the online class the same quality of interaction that students and teachers would have in a physical classroom. With this kind of setup in place students and teachers can discuss topics in real time instead of relying on email and threaded discussions as the primary means of communication. This system also allows the teacher to present and share material in real time in both audio and video with the use of screen sharing or video streaming. As I stated before past students have also said that the ability for them to review the session recordings has actually made the online sessions more effective than face to face sessions that they are not able to review as easily. Obviously this is an ongoing process of learning and exploration both for myself and for the area of online education as a whole. I would appreciate your comments and feedback as I continue on this journey.
Hi, welcome to my website. Check here to find articles that I have written about Education Technology and Music Education as well as Technology tutorials and product recommendations for teachers.
~Tim